DSpace Repository

Organizational Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Industries: Problem Investigation as Off-Line Reflective Practice

Show simple item record

dc.creator Rudolph, Jenny
dc.creator Hatakenaka, Sachi
dc.creator Carroll, John S.
dc.date 2002-08-16T17:04:35Z
dc.date 2002-08-16T17:04:35Z
dc.date 2002-08-16T17:04:44Z
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-31T18:48:06Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-31T18:48:06Z
dc.date.issued 2013-06-01
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1600
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/1721
dc.description Learning from experience, the cyclical interplay of thinking and doing, is increasingly important as organizations struggle to cope with rapidly changing environments and more complex and interdependent sets of knowledge. This paper confronts two central issues for organizational learning: (1) how is local learning (by individuals or small groups) integrated into collective learning by organizations? and (2) what are the differences between learning practices that focus on control, elimination of surprises, and single-loop incremental ?fixing? of problems with those that focus on deep or radical learning, double-loop challenging of assumptions, and discovery of new opportunities? We articulate these relationships through an analysis of particular learning practices in highhazard organizations, specifically, problem investigation teams that examine the most serious and troubling events and trends in nuclear power plants and chemical plants. We first distinguish a controlling orientation from a rethinking orientation, and illustrate learning practices with three case studies from the nuclear power and chemical industries and a questionnaire study of three nuclear power plants. We then extend our framework to create a four-stage model of organizational learning: (1) local learning by decentralized individuals and work groups, (2) constrained learning in a context of compliance with rules, (3) open learning prompted by acknowledgement of doubt and desire to learn, and (4) deep learning based on skillful inquiry and systemic mental models. These four stages contrast whether learning is primarily single-loop or double-loop, i.e., whether the organization can surface and challenge the assumptions and mental models underlying behavior, and whether learning is relatively improvised or structured. We conclude with a discussion of the stages, levels of learning (team, organizational, and individual), and the role of action, thinking, and emotion in organizational learning.
dc.format 569267 bytes
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en_US
dc.relation MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4359-02
dc.subject Off-Line Reflective Practice
dc.subject Organizational Learning
dc.subject High-Hazard Industries
dc.title Organizational Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Industries: Problem Investigation as Off-Line Reflective Practice

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account