| dc.creator |
Eric, Van den Steen |
|
| dc.date |
2002-08-09T19:17:38Z |
|
| dc.date |
2002-08-09T19:17:38Z |
|
| dc.date |
2002-08-09T19:17:50Z |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2013-05-31T18:32:34Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2013-05-31T18:32:34Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2013-06-01 |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1569 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/1721 |
|
| dc.description |
This paper shows why, in a world with differing priors, rational agents tend to attribute
their own success more to skill and their failure more to bad luck than an outsider. It
further shows why each agent in a group might think he or she is the best, why an
agent might overestimate the control he has over the outcome, and why two agents'
estimated contributions often add up to more than 100%. Underlying all these
phenomena is a simple and robust mechanism that endogenously generates
overoptimism about one's own actions. The paper also shows how these biases hinder
learning and discusses some implications for organizations. |
|
| dc.format |
493511 bytes |
|
| dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
| dc.language |
en_US |
|
| dc.relation |
MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4255-02 |
|
| dc.subject |
Success |
|
| dc.subject |
Failure |
|
| dc.subject |
Attribution and Inference Bias |
|
| dc.subject |
Rational Agents |
|
| dc.title |
Skill or Luck? Biases of Rational Agents |
|