DSpace Repository

Synergy between Direct and Representative Forms of Employee Voice: Evidence from the European Car Components Industry

Show simple item record

dc.creator Sako, Mari
dc.date 2002-07-18T15:21:13Z
dc.date 2002-07-18T15:21:13Z
dc.date 2002-07-18T15:21:13Z
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-31T17:31:23Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-31T17:31:23Z
dc.date.issued 2013-06-01
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1464
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/1721
dc.description This paper analyses the implications of combining direct and representative forms of worker participation for business performance. Direct participation refers to such things as quality control circles, continuous improvement teams and other problem-solving groups, while representatwe participation refers to joint consultation committees,including those between works councils and management. Using a 1994 survey of first-tier automotive parts plants in Europe, this paper finds evidence that better quality and information sharing result born having both forms of worker participation than having one or the other. The survey also shows that in the fist half of the 1990s, there has been a rapid diffusion of direct participation (together with a commitment to employment security) and a moderate diffusion of indirect participation mechanisms in the UK. While not ruling out legislation, the paper concludes by drawing implications of this finding for a further discussion of these practices through voluntary means.
dc.format 1124076 bytes
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en_US
dc.relation IMVP;177a
dc.subject european car company
dc.subject worker participation
dc.title Synergy between Direct and Representative Forms of Employee Voice: Evidence from the European Car Components Industry


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account