GM ethical decision making in practice

dc.creator	Donald Bruce
dc.date	2002
dc.date.accessioned	2013-05-30T11:15:33Z
dc.date.available	2013-05-30T11:15:33Z
dc.date.issued	2013-05-30
dc.identifier	http://www.int-res.com/articles/esep/2002/E19.pdf
dc.identifier	http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=article&issn=16118014&date=2002&volume=2002&issue=&spage=75
dc.identifier.uri	http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/4468
dc.description	Celia Deane-Drummond's case for wisdom as an approach to ethical decision making and her doubts about case-oriented methodology are critiqued with reference to the SRT Project's Engineering Genesis study. Its approach is explored in practical decisions on various real life examples of genetic modification in crops and animals. It involved both intrinsic and consequential approaches, and identified key value positions behind different policies and stakeholders. The paper also clarifies the relationship between reactive (cost-benefit) and precautionary risk assessment, explaining their strengths and limitations, and the role of underlying values in both forms of risk decision making.
dc.publisher	Inter-Research
dc.source	Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics
dc.title	GM ethical decision making in practice

الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات	الحجم	الصيغة	عرض
لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.