المستودع الأكاديمي جامعة المدينة

Logic of Leadership Research: A Reflective Review of <i>Geeks & Geezers</i> by Bennis and Thomas

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator D. P. Dash
dc.date 2005
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-30T10:39:57Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-30T10:39:57Z
dc.date.issued 2013-05-30
dc.identifier http://jrp.icaap.org/content/v1.1/dash.html
dc.identifier http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=article&issn=1712851X&date=2005&volume=1&issue=1&spage=R1
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/4124
dc.description [First two paragraphs] Leadership has turned out to be one of those topics, which persistently slip out of scientific hands. The field of leadership research should be of interest to researchers in various other disciplines, because it serves as a source of examples of many <i>common difficulties</i> faced by researchers in general. These relate to difficulties in defining a research task, specifying quality criteria, choosing methods, ensuring that the research programme remains <i>progressive</i> (the criterion is from Lakatos, see Science and Pseudoscience, 2004; Worrall & Currie, 1978), etc. The book by well-known leadership researchers, Bennis and Thomas, gives us an occasion to critically appreciate the practice of leadership research so far and assess the book’s potential contribution. This will be done by first outlining the developments in leadership research since the 1930s. It will be shown that although the book’s focus is interestingly different, it does not go so far as to reframe the <i>logic of research</i> in the field.
dc.publisher International Consortium for the Advancement in Academic Publication (ICAAP)
dc.source Journal of Research Practice
dc.subject logic of research
dc.title Logic of Leadership Research: A Reflective Review of <i>Geeks & Geezers</i> by Bennis and Thomas


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط