أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator Gottschalk, Peter
dc.date 2004
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-16T07:11:17Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-16T07:11:17Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-16
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20595
dc.identifier ppn:472875426
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/20595
dc.description This paper presents a new method to correct for measurement error in wage data and applies this method to address an old question. How much downward wage flexibility is there in the U.S? We apply standard methods developed by Bai and Perron (1998b) to identify structural breaks in time series data. Applying these methods to wage histories allows us to identify when each person experienced a change in nominal wages. The length of the period of constant nominal wages is left unrestricted and is allowed to differ across individuals, as is the size and direction of the nominal wage change. We apply these methods to data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation. The evidence we provide indicates that the probability of a cut in nominal wages is substantially overstated in data that is not corrected for measurement error.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher
dc.relation IZA Discussion paper series 1327
dc.rights http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject J38
dc.subject ddc:330
dc.subject nominal wage rigidity
dc.subject measurement error
dc.subject Lohnrigidität
dc.subject Messung
dc.subject Statistischer Fehler
dc.subject Schätzung
dc.subject Vereinigte Staaten
dc.title Downward Nominal Wage Flexibility : Real or Measurement Error?
dc.type doc-type:workingPaper


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط