DSpace Repository

The Promotion Dynamics of American Executives

Show simple item record

dc.creator Belzil, Christian
dc.creator Bognanno, Michael
dc.date 2004
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-16T07:09:27Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-16T07:09:27Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-16
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20238
dc.identifier ppn:378240889
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/20238
dc.description We formulate an empirical model of promotion with dynamic self-selection where the current promotion probability depends on the hierarchical level in the firm, individual human capital, unobserved (to the econometrician) individual specific attributes, time varying firm specific variables (firm size and profits) as well as endogenous past promotion histories. We examine the causal effect of previous promotion histories (as measured by realized speed of promotion) on future promotion outcomes. The model is fit on an 8 year panel of promotion histories of 30,000 American executives employed in more than 380 different firms. The stochastic process generating promotions is weakly correlated with standard human capital endowment variables (age, schooling and tenure). It may be viewed as a series of promotion probabilities which become smaller as an individual moves up in the hierarchy and is primarily explained by individual (or firm) specific factors other than measured human capital. We also find that, conditional on unobservables, the promotion probability is only mildly enhanced, on average, by the speed of promotion achieved in the past (a structural fast track effect). However, we find the existence of a relatively high cross-sectional dispersion in the effect of past promotion histories and we are able to provide an explanation for this relatively high dispersion. In general, the magnitude of the individual specific effect of achieved speed of promotion is inversely related to accumulated human capital (schooling and tenure). We believe that these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the signaling aspect of past promotions is stronger for those who are less educated and stronger for those who are relatively new in a firm. We also find that a negative correlation between current promotion and past speed of promotion cannot be ruled out for a portion of the population, and we are able to relate this finding to the ?Peter Principle?.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher
dc.relation IZA Discussion paper series 1003
dc.rights http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject M5
dc.subject J41
dc.subject M51
dc.subject C33
dc.subject ddc:330
dc.subject personnel economics
dc.subject promotion
dc.subject dynamic discrete choices
dc.subject random effects
dc.subject Führungskräfte
dc.subject Erwerbsverlauf
dc.subject Humankapital
dc.subject Schätzung
dc.subject Vereinigte Staaten
dc.title The Promotion Dynamics of American Executives
dc.type doc-type:workingPaper


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account