أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator Gale, Douglas
dc.creator Vives, Xavier
dc.date 2002
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-16T07:04:15Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-16T07:04:15Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-16
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19347
dc.identifier ppn:346910994
dc.identifier RePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26195
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19347
dc.description Central bank policy suffers from time-inconsistency when facing a banking crisis : A bailout is optimal ex post but ex ante it should be limited to control moral hazard. Dollarization provides a credible commitment not to help at the cost of not helping even when it would be ex ante optimal to do so. Dollarization is good when the costs of establishing a reputation for the central bank are high, monitoring effort by the banker is important in improving returns, and when the cost of liquidating projects is moderate. However, a very severe moral hazard problem could make dollarization Undesirable. The results obtained are applied to assess the desirability of dollarization in a range of countries and the potential role of the IMF as International LOLR.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher
dc.relation HWWA Discussion Paper 185
dc.rights http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject ddc:330
dc.subject Währungssubstitution
dc.subject US-Dollar
dc.subject Geldpolitik
dc.subject Bank
dc.subject Kleines-offenes-Land
dc.subject Theorie
dc.title Dollarization, bailouts, and the stability of the banking system
dc.type doc-type:workingPaper


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط