المستودع الأكاديمي جامعة المدينة

What Determines Evaluation Outcomes? Evidence from Bi- and Multilateral Development Cooperation

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator Michaelowa, Katharina
dc.creator Borrmann, Axel
dc.date 2004
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-16T07:04:02Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-16T07:04:02Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-16
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19282
dc.identifier ppn:481683208
dc.identifier RePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26176
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19282
dc.description Donor agencies invest considerable financial and human resources to evaluate the outcome of their development activities. To derive institutional conditions conducive to an efficient use of these resources, we develop a multi-level principal-agent model focusing on the various interests of the different actors involved in the evaluation process. The model highlights two central problems: (i) the aid agencies? conflicting objectives of transparency and self-legitimization, and (ii) the potential collusion between the evaluator and the project manager. Empirical evidence for the World Bank and different German donor agencies reveals concrete institutional requirements for a reduced evaluation bias and increased transparency.
dc.language eng
dc.relation HWWA Discussion Paper 310
dc.rights http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject D73
dc.subject F35
dc.subject H43
dc.subject ddc:330
dc.subject Development cooperation
dc.subject evaluation
dc.subject political economy
dc.subject Entwicklungshilfe
dc.subject Entwicklungsorganisation
dc.subject Entwicklungsprojekt
dc.subject Projektbewertung
dc.title What Determines Evaluation Outcomes? Evidence from Bi- and Multilateral Development Cooperation
dc.type doc-type:workingPaper


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط