DSpace Repository

A case for tolerance in marine ecology: let us not put out the baby with the bathwater

Show simple item record

dc.creator Gili, Josep Maria
dc.creator Arntz, Wolf E.
dc.date 2008-06-27T07:05:13Z
dc.date 2008-06-27T07:05:13Z
dc.date 2001
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-31T02:11:17Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-31T02:11:17Z
dc.identifier Scientia Marina 65(Suppl.2): 283-299 (2001)
dc.identifier 0214-8358 (print edition)
dc.identifier 1886-8134 (online edition)
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10261/5396
dc.identifier 10.3989/scimar.2001.65s2283
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/5396
dc.description Publicación online disponible en: http://www.icm.csic.es/scimar/index.php
dc.description After working in marine ecological research and lecturing at universities for several decades, the authors are aware that almost none of the concepts and paradigms established at the time they were students or in the decades before have survived unchanged up to the present day. This appears quite natural taking into account the enormous progress made by marine science due to refined methods, extended range of research e.g. into the deep sea and the polar regions, increased number of researchers and funding, and greatly improved and accelerated exchange of scientific results. What is striking, however, against this background is the almost messianic fervour with which many of our professional guild (and not only the younger ones lacking experience) call for the immediate “abolishment” or “dismissal” of old ideas because their creators were wrong in thinking the way they did. In these authors` opinion, there is a basic misunderstandig about the role of ecological concepts in scientific argumentation. Very few concepts are so foolish that they can be dismissed entirely without any loss; the vast majority contain some truth that may fit at least certain situations, and may thus serve as a brickstone in constructing ecological theory. An attempt will be made to expand on that point in this contribution. What is more important: many of the concepts nowadays considered (partially?) erroneous have stimulated scientific discussion enormously, in some cases up to the present day and have, by their mere existence, guaranteed that ecological work was found necessary to continue in the respective fields. Finally, observing the tremendous pace at which ecological progress is being made these days in some disciplines and at the same time, the degree of uncertainty we are - despite all efforts - still facing in others, it is not difficult to anticipate that many of the new ideas replacing the old concepts nowadays will end up shortly on the garbage dump of science history as well. So tolerance should be the motto: let us not put out the baby with the bathwater! Give the old concepts their credit, look eagerly for alternatives and try to provide the best possible evidence for your results, but be modest. There may be various solutions to one ecological problem, and the way to handle this situation is differentiation, not abolishment.
dc.description Peer reviewed
dc.format 126212 bytes
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language eng
dc.publisher CSIC - Instituto de Ciencias del Mar (ICM)
dc.relation http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2001.65s2283
dc.rights openAccess
dc.subject Stimulating scientific discussion
dc.subject New ideas replacing old concepts
dc.subject Science history
dc.subject Tolerance
dc.subject Thorson’s rule
dc.subject Polar regions
dc.title A case for tolerance in marine ecology: let us not put out the baby with the bathwater
dc.type Artículo

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account