أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator Guillén, Pablo
dc.creator Schwieren, Christiane
dc.creator Staffiero, Gianandrea
dc.date 2007-11-14T08:52:15Z
dc.date 2007-11-14T08:52:15Z
dc.date 2004
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-31T00:58:35Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-31T00:58:35Z
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10261/2109
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/2109
dc.description Using a step-level public good game, we analyze the effects on contributions of having played under a sanctioning regime. We find that ”educational” effects, in terms of learning a particular way to coordinate towards ”good” equilibria, are more relevant than motivational ”crowding out” effects, whereby cooperating to avoid sanctions spoils intrinsic incentives. If groups vote, they decide to remove the costly sanctioning regime; then they cooperate as much as in automatic removal only when this decision entails a clear ”trust” message.
dc.description Peer reviewed
dc.language eng
dc.relation IESA Working Paper Series
dc.relation WP 04-04
dc.rights openAccess
dc.subject Public Good
dc.subject Step-level
dc.subject Sanctioning Institution
dc.subject Cooperation
dc.subject Education
dc.subject Trust
dc.title Feeding the Leviathan
dc.type Documento de trabajo


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط