أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator Fatás, Enrique
dc.creator Neugebauer, Tibor
dc.creator Tamborero, Pilar
dc.date 2007-11-14T08:37:05Z
dc.date 2007-11-14T08:37:05Z
dc.date 2004
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-31T00:58:31Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-31T00:58:31Z
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10261/2101
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/2101
dc.description The present paper reports on a political choice experiment with elected real-world politicians. A questionnaire on political and public issues is taken to examine whether prospect theory predicts the responses of experts from the field better than rational choice theory. The results indicate that framing effects exist but that expertise may weaken the deviation from rational choice.
dc.description Authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Generalitat Valenciana (code CTIDIA/2002/208) and Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (code BEC2002-04380-C02-01).
dc.language eng
dc.relation IESA Working Paper Series
dc.relation WP 10-04
dc.rights openAccess
dc.subject Subject pool effect
dc.subject Subject surrogacy
dc.subject Expected utility theory
dc.subject Prospect theory
dc.title How Politicians Make Decisions: A Political Choice Experiment
dc.type Documento de trabajo


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط