المستودع الأكاديمي جامعة المدينة

Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator Cespa, Giovanni
dc.creator Cestone, Giacinta
dc.date 2007-11-06T08:55:10Z
dc.date 2007-11-06T08:55:10Z
dc.date 2002-07-21
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-31T00:58:05Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-31T00:58:05Z
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10261/1887
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/1887
dc.description We argue that when stakeholder protection is left to the voluntary initiative of managers, concessions to social activists and pressure groups can turn into a self-entrenchment strategy for incumbent CEOs. Stakeholders other than shareholders thus benefit from corporate governance rules putting managers under a tough replacement threat. We show that a minimal amount of formal stakeholder protection, or the introduction of explicit covenants protecting stakeholder rights in the firm charter, may deprive CEOs of the alliance with powerful social activists, thus increasing managerial turnover and shareholder value. These results rationalize a recent trend whereby well-known social activists like Friends of the Earth and active shareholders like CalPERS are showing a growing support for each other's agendas.
dc.language eng
dc.relation UFAE and IAE Working Papers
dc.relation 528.02
dc.rights openAccess
dc.subject Corporate governance
dc.subject Managerial entrenchment
dc.subject Social activists
dc.subject Small shareholders
dc.subject Stakeholder society
dc.title Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
dc.type Documento de trabajo


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط