DSpace Repository

Prognostic accuracy of WHO growth standards to predict mortality in a large-scale nutritional program in Niger

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Epicentre, Paris, France; European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden; Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France
dc.creator Lapidus, N
dc.creator Luquero, F J
dc.creator Gaboulaud, V
dc.creator Shepherd, S
dc.creator Grais, R
dc.date 2009-03-03
dc.date.accessioned 2017-01-31T07:14:10Z
dc.date.available 2017-01-31T07:14:10Z
dc.identifier PLoS Med 2009;6(3):e39
dc.identifier 1549-1676
dc.identifier 19260760
dc.identifier 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000039
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10144/67631
dc.identifier http://fieldresearch.msf.org/msf/handle/10144/67631
dc.identifier PLoS Medicine
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10144/67631
dc.description BACKGROUND: Important differences exist in the diagnosis of malnutrition when comparing the 2006 World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the 1977 National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) reference. However, their relationship with mortality has not been studied. Here, we assessed the accuracy of the WHO standards and the NCHS reference in predicting death in a population of malnourished children in a large nutritional program in Niger. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We analyzed data from 64,484 children aged 6-59 mo admitted with malnutrition (<80% weight-for-height percentage of the median [WH]% [NCHS] and/or mid-upper arm circumference [MUAC] <110 mm and/or presence of edema) in 2006 into the Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) nutritional program in Maradi, Niger. Sensitivity and specificity of weight-for-height in terms of Z score (WHZ) and WH% for both WHO standards and NCHS reference were calculated using mortality as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity of MUAC were also calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was traced for these cutoffs and its area under curve (AUC) estimated. In predicting mortality, WHZ (NCHS) and WH% (NCHS) showed AUC values of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.66) and 0.71 (CI 0.68-0.74), respectively. WHZ (WHO) and WH% (WHO) appeared to provide higher accuracy with AUC values of 0.76 (CI 0.75-0.80) and 0.77 (CI 0.75-0.80), respectively. The relationship between MUAC and mortality risk appeared to be relatively weak, with AUC = 0.63 (CI 0.60-0.67). Analyses stratified by sex and age yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in this population of children being treated for malnutrition, WH indicators calculated using WHO standards were more accurate for predicting mortality risk than those calculated using the NCHS reference. The findings are valid for a population of already malnourished children and are not necessarily generalizable to a population of children being screened for malnutrition. Future work is needed to assess which criteria are best for admission purposes to identify children most likely to benefit from therapeutic or supplementary feeding programs.
dc.language en
dc.publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000039
dc.rights Published by Public Library of Science, [url]http://medicine.plosjournals.org/[/url] Archived on this site by Open Access permission
dc.title Prognostic accuracy of WHO growth standards to predict mortality in a large-scale nutritional program in Niger
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account