Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/5978
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMataric, Maja-
dc.date2004-10-04T14:25:16Z-
dc.date2004-10-04T14:25:16Z-
dc.date1991-10-01-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:42:10Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:42:10Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-09-
dc.identifierAIM-1322-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5978-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721-
dc.descriptionThis paper analyzes the suitability of reinforcement learning (RL) for both programming and adapting situated agents. We discuss two RL algorithms: Q-learning and the Bucket Brigade. We introduce a special case of the Bucket Brigade, and analyze and compare its performance to Q in a number of experiments. Next we discuss the key problems of RL: time and space complexity, input generalization, sensitivity to parameter values, and selection of the reinforcement function. We address the tradeoffs between the built-in and learned knowledge and the number of training examples required by a learning algorithm. Finally, we suggest directions for future research.-
dc.format13 p.-
dc.format1444645 bytes-
dc.format1130480 bytes-
dc.formatapplication/postscript-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_US-
dc.relationAIM-1322-
dc.subjectreinforcement-
dc.subjectlearning-
dc.subjectsituated agents-
dc.subjectinputsgeneralization-
dc.subjectcomplexity-
dc.subjectbuilt-in knowledge-
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Methods-
Appears in Collections:MIT Items

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.