Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/4049
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorXue, Yanfeng-
dc.date2004-02-13T19:27:21Z-
dc.date2004-02-13T19:27:21Z-
dc.date2004-02-13T19:27:21Z-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:33:59Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:33:59Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-09-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/4049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721-
dc.descriptionFirms obtain new technology either through internal R&D or through acquisitions. These two approaches are usually labeled as "make" and "buy" strategies. In this paper, I examine the relation between a firm's choice of "make" or "buy" and the performance measures used in the firm's CEO compensation contract. I focus on the two major differences between "make" and "buy" strategies: the risk levels and accounting treatments. I then examine the differential implications of accounting-based and stock-based performance measures on managers' incentive in choosing between the two strategies. Using data from US high tech industries, I find that, firms relying on "buy" approach to obtain technology tend to depend more on the accounting-based performance measures, while those firms who innovate through R&D activities skew toward stock-based pay especially stock options-
dc.format194036 bytes-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_US-
dc.relationMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4436-03-
dc.subjectR&D-
dc.subjectAcquisition-
dc.subjectCompensation-
dc.subjectTechnology-
dc.titleMake or Buy New Technology – a CEO Compensation Contract’s Role in a Firm’s Route to Innovation-
dc.typeWorking Paper-
Appears in Collections:MIT Items

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.