Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/4314
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorTesfaselassie, Mewael F.-
dc.creatorSchaling, Eric-
dc.date2008-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T06:06:13Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T06:06:13Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierKiel working paper Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel 1429-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/4314-
dc.identifierppn:571070957-
dc.identifierppn:571070957-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/4314-
dc.descriptionIn this paper we analyze disinflation policy when a central bank has imperfect information about private sector inflation expectations but learns about them from economic outcomes, which are in part the result of the disinflation policy. The form of uncertainty is manifested as uncertainty about the effect of past disinflation policy on current output gap. Thus current as well as past policy actions matter for output gap determination. We derive the optimal policy under learning (DOP) and compare it two limiting cases---certainty equivalence policy (CEP) and cautionary policy (CP). It turns out that under the DOP inflation stay between the levels implied by the CEP and the CP. A novel result is that this holds irrespective of the initial level of inflation. Moreover, while at high levels of inherited inflation the DOP moves closer to the CEP, at low levels of inherited inflation the DOP resembles the CP.-
dc.descriptionIn this paper we analyze disinflation policy when a central bank has imperfect information about private sector inflation expectations but learns about them from economic outcomes, which are in part the result of the disinflation policy. The form of uncertainty is manifested as uncertainty about the effect of past disinflation policy on current output gap. Thus current as well as past policy actions matter for output gap determination. We derive the optimal policy under learning (DOP) and compare it two limiting cases---certainty equivalence policy (CEP) and cautionary policy (CP). It turns out that under the DOP inflation stay between the levels implied by the CEP and the CP. A novel result is that this holds irrespective of the initial level of inflation. Moreover, while at high levels of inherited inflation the DOP moves closer to the CEP, at low levels of inherited inflation the DOP resembles the CP. -- Learning ; inflation expectations ; disinflation policy ; separation principle ; Kalman filter ; optimal control-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kiel-
dc.relationKieler Arbeitspapiere 1429-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectE52-
dc.subjectF33-
dc.subjectC53-
dc.subjectE43-
dc.subjectC53-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectLearning , Inflation Expectations , Disinflation Policy , Separation Principle , Kalman Filter , Optimal Control-
dc.subjectInflationsbekämpfung-
dc.subjectEntscheidung bei Unsicherheit-
dc.subjectInflationserwartung-
dc.subjectLernprozess-
dc.subjectKontrolltheorie-
dc.subjectZustandsraummodell-
dc.subjectTheorie-
dc.titleManaging disinflation under uncertainty-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.