Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19282
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMichaelowa, Katharina-
dc.creatorBorrmann, Axel-
dc.date2004-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T07:04:02Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T07:04:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/19282-
dc.identifierppn:481683208-
dc.identifierRePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26176-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19282-
dc.descriptionDonor agencies invest considerable financial and human resources to evaluate the outcome of their development activities. To derive institutional conditions conducive to an efficient use of these resources, we develop a multi-level principal-agent model focusing on the various interests of the different actors involved in the evaluation process. The model highlights two central problems: (i) the aid agencies? conflicting objectives of transparency and self-legitimization, and (ii) the potential collusion between the evaluator and the project manager. Empirical evidence for the World Bank and different German donor agencies reveals concrete institutional requirements for a reduced evaluation bias and increased transparency.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relationHWWA Discussion Paper 310-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectD73-
dc.subjectF35-
dc.subjectH43-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectDevelopment cooperation-
dc.subjectevaluation-
dc.subjectpolitical economy-
dc.subjectEntwicklungshilfe-
dc.subjectEntwicklungsorganisation-
dc.subjectEntwicklungsprojekt-
dc.subjectProjektbewertung-
dc.titleWhat Determines Evaluation Outcomes? Evidence from Bi- and Multilateral Development Cooperation-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.