Transfers, non-traded goods, and unemployment : an analysis of the Keynes-Ohlin debate

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19052

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.creator	Brakman, Steven	-
dc.creator	van Marrewijk, Charles	-
dc.date	2005	-
dc.date.accessioned	2013-10-16T07:02:36Z	-
dc.date.available	2013-10-16T07:02:36Z	-
dc.date.issued	2013-10-16	-
dc.identifier	http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19052	-
dc.identifier	ppn:503742376	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19052	-
dc.description	In the famous debate between Keynes and Ohlin on the transfer problem, the interaction between non-traded goods and unemployment complicates the analysis considerably. We analyze these issues using four different models to conclude that Keynes?s concern regarding the large burden imposed on Germany was justified. Simultaneously, we show that Ohlin?s presumption that a transfer does not affect the donor?s terms-of-trade either favourably or unfavourably was also justified. Moreover, Ohlin was also right in asserting that a transfer tends to lower the price of non-traded goods for the donor and raise them for the recipient.	-
dc.language	eng	-
dc.relation	CESifo working papers 1588	-
dc.rights	http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen	-
dc.subject	B0	-
dc.subject	O1	-
dc.subject	F0	-
dc.subject	ddc:330	-
dc.subject	Internationaler Transfer	-
dc.subject	Terms of Trade	-
dc.subject	Nicht-handelbares Gut	-
dc.subject	Arbeitslosigkeit	-
dc.subject	Theorie	-
dc.subject	Deutschland <bis 1945>	-
dc.title	Transfers, non-traded goods, and unemployment : an analysis of the Keynes-Ohlin debate	-
dc.type	doc-type:workingPaper	-
Appears in Collections:	EconStor

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

DSpace JSPUI