Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19022
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorEgger, Peter-
dc.creatorLarch, Mario-
dc.creatorPfaffermayr, Michael-
dc.creatorWalde, Janette F.-
dc.date2005-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T07:02:26Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T07:02:26Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/19022-
dc.identifierppn:503677639-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19022-
dc.descriptionThis paper undertakes a Monte Carlo study to compare MLE-based and GMM-based tests regarding the spatial autocorrelation coefficient of the error term in a Cliff and Ord type model. The main finding is that a Wald-test based on GMM estimation as derived by Kelejian and Prucha (2005a) performs surprisingly well. Our Monte Carlo study indicates that the GMM Wald-test is correctly sized even in small samples and exhibits the same power as their MLE-based counterparts. Since GMM estimates are much easier to calculate, the GMM Wald-test is recommended for applied researches.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisher-
dc.relationCESifo working papers 1558-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectC12-
dc.subjectR10-
dc.subjectC21-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectspatial autocorrelation-
dc.subjecthypothesis tests-
dc.subjectMonte Carlo studies-
dc.subjectmaximum likelihood estimation-
dc.subjectgeneralized method of moments-
dc.subjectMaximum-Likelihood-Methode-
dc.subjectMomentenmethode-
dc.subjectAutokorrelation-
dc.subjectStatistischer Test-
dc.subjectTheorie-
dc.titleSmall sample properties of maximum likelihood versus generalized method of moments based tests for spatially autocorrelated errors-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.