Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18846
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorHeer, Burkhard-
dc.creatorMaußner, Alfred-
dc.date2004-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T07:01:34Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T07:01:34Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18846-
dc.identifierppn:389732796-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18846-
dc.descriptionWe compare the numerical methods that are most widely applied in the computation of the standard business cycle model with flexible labor. The numerical techniques imply economically insignificant differences with regard to business cycle summary statistics except for the volatility of investment. Furthermore, these results are robust with regard to the choice of the functional form of the utility function and the model?s parameterization. In conclusion, the simplest and fastest method, the log-linearization of the model around the steady state, is found to be most convenient and appropriate for the standard business cycle model.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relationCESifo working papers 1207-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectE32-
dc.subjectC68-
dc.subjectC63-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectlog-linearization-
dc.subjectprojection methods-
dc.subjectextended path-
dc.subjectvalue function iteration-
dc.subjectparameterized expectations-
dc.subjectgenetic search-
dc.subjectKonjunkturtheorie-
dc.subjectArbeitsmarktflexibilisierung-
dc.subjectNumerisches Verfahren-
dc.subjectVergleich-
dc.subjectTheorie-
dc.titleComputation of business cycle models : a comparison of numerical methods-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.