Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18590
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorVance, Colin-
dc.date2006-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T07:00:39Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T07:00:39Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18590-
dc.identifierppn:511472765-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18590-
dc.descriptionThis paper illustrates two techniques for calculating the statistical significance of the marginal effects derived from Heckman?s sample selection model,an increasingly common econometric specification in political science. The discussion draws on an analysis by Sweeney (2003) of the incidence and intensity of interstate disputes. After replicating his results, the paper presents the delta method and the nonparametric bootstrap as alternative techniques for obtaining standard errors of the marginal effects, which themselves are calculated from a transformation of the model parameters.The analysis reveals two variables for which misleading inferences are drawn with respect to the precision of the estimated coefficients in the original study, suggesting that significance testing of the derived marginal effects is warranted.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisher-
dc.relationRWI Discussion Papers 39-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectC34-
dc.subjectC12-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectHeckman model-
dc.subjectstatistical significance-
dc.subjectdelta method-
dc.subjectnonparametric bootstrap-
dc.subjectdispute severity-
dc.titleMarginal effects and significance testing with Heckman's sample selection model: a methodological note-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.