Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18069
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorSchröder, Philipp J. H.-
dc.date2003-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T06:58:07Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T06:58:07Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18069-
dc.identifierppn:368873234-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18069-
dc.descriptionThis paper shows that the welfare dominance of ad valorem over unit taxes under imperfect competition, extends to the Dixit-Stiglitz framework with differentiated products, entry and love of variety. This contrasts against findings by Anderson et al. (J Public Econ, 2001) made in a similar framework, but under Bertrand competition.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherDeutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Berlin-
dc.relationDIW-Diskussionspapiere 333-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectD43-
dc.subjectL13-
dc.subjectH22-
dc.subjectH21-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectUnit tax-
dc.subjectSpecific tax-
dc.subjectAd valorem tax-
dc.subjectWelfare-
dc.subjectUmsatzsteuer-
dc.subjectVerbrauchsteuer-
dc.subjectMonopolistischer Wettbewerb-
dc.subjectWohlfahrtseffekt-
dc.subjectTheorie-
dc.titleThe Comparison Between Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes under Monopolistic Competition-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.