Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/17943
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGersbach, Hans-
dc.date2007-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T06:57:30Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T06:57:30Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/17943-
dc.identifierppn:558204961-
dc.identifierRePEc:zbw:ifwedp:5567-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/17943-
dc.descriptionWe propose a two-stage process called minority voting to allocate public projects in a polity. In the first period, a society decides by a simple majority decision whether to provide the public project. If the proposal in the first period is rejected, the process ends. Otherwise the process continues, but only the members of the minority keep agenda and voting rights for the second stage, in which the financing scheme is determined. In the second stage, the unanimity rule or the simple majority rule is applied. We provide a first round of relative welfare comparisons between minority voting and simple majority voting and outline our research program.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kiel-
dc.relationEconomics Discussion Papers / Institut für Weltwirtschaft 2007-20-
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/de/deed.en-
dc.subjectD60-
dc.subjectD72-
dc.subjectH40-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectdemocratic constitutions-
dc.subjectminority voting-
dc.subjectpublic projects-
dc.titleMinority Voting and Public Project Provision-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.