Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/17873
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMcCallum, Bennett T.-
dc.date2007-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T06:57:09Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T06:57:09Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/17873-
dc.identifierppn:535022026-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/17873-
dc.descriptionIt is clear that at present various versions of the Calvo (1983) model of price adjustment are dominant in monetary policy analysis?see, e.g., Woodford (2003). This is true despite well-known criticisms including Mankiw (2001) or Mankiw and Reis (2002) and the well-documented need for the addition of ad-hoc features if actual inflation and output data are to be matched. Accordingly, there is ample reason, to give consideration to alternative models. In this paper, a new look is given to the P-bar model utilized by McCallum and Nelson (1999a, 1999b), based on previous work by Mussa (1981) and others. Relative to the Calvo model, the P-bar specification has three significant advantages: it satisfies the strict version of the natural rate hypothesis; it relies on costs of adjusting output, which are more tangible than menu costs of changing prices; and its basic version produces more realistic autocorrelation patterns than does the basic Calvo specification. The present paper develops these comparisons more completely and systematically than in previous work.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kiel-
dc.relationKieler Arbeitspapiere 1361-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.titleBasic Calvo and P-Bar Models of Price Adjustment: A Comparison-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.