Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/2101
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFatás, Enrique-
dc.creatorNeugebauer, Tibor-
dc.creatorTamborero, Pilar-
dc.date2007-11-14T08:37:05Z-
dc.date2007-11-14T08:37:05Z-
dc.date2004-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T00:58:31Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-31T00:58:31Z-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/2101-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/2101-
dc.descriptionThe present paper reports on a political choice experiment with elected real-world politicians. A questionnaire on political and public issues is taken to examine whether prospect theory predicts the responses of experts from the field better than rational choice theory. The results indicate that framing effects exist but that expertise may weaken the deviation from rational choice.-
dc.descriptionAuthors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Generalitat Valenciana (code CTIDIA/2002/208) and Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (code BEC2002-04380-C02-01).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relationIESA Working Paper Series-
dc.relationWP 10-04-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectSubject pool effect-
dc.subjectSubject surrogacy-
dc.subjectExpected utility theory-
dc.subjectProspect theory-
dc.titleHow Politicians Make Decisions: A Political Choice Experiment-
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo-
Appears in Collections:Digital Csic

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.