Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/1885
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCaminal, Ramón-
dc.creatorMatutes, Carmen-
dc.date2007-11-06T08:52:32Z-
dc.date2007-11-06T08:52:32Z-
dc.date2002-07-01-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T00:58:05Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-31T00:58:05Z-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/1885-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/1885-
dc.descriptionWe study how market power affects investment and welfare when banks choose between restricting loan sizes and monitoring, in order to alleviate an underlying moral hazard problem. The impact of market power on aggregate welfare is the result of two countervailing effects. An increase in banks' market power results in: (i) higher lending rates, which worsens the borrower's incentive problem and reduces investment by unmonitored firms, (ii) higher monitoring effort, which reduces the proportion of credit-constrained firms. Whenever the second effect dominates, it is optimal to provide banks with some degree of market power.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relationUFAE and IAE Working Papers-
dc.relation527.02-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectMarket power-
dc.subjectMonitoring-
dc.subjectLoan size rationing-
dc.subjectMoral hazard-
dc.titleCan competition in the credit market be excessive?-
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo-
Appears in Collections:Digital Csic

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.